Comparing Sony C-80 & C-100 Condenser Mics: How Do They Sound

How Do They Sound? Comparing Sony's C-80 & C-100 Condenser Mics

See the full details here.

How do They Sound? Comparing Sony’s C-80 & C-100 Condenser Mics

When it comes to sound production, quality is key. This is especially true in the world of audio engineering where a single microphone can make a whole world of difference. Sony’s C-80 and C-100 condenser mics are two popular options amongst the audio engineering community, but how do they really stack up against each other in terms of sound?

Technical Specifications

The first step to learning how they sound is to understand their technical specifications. The Sony C-80 features a fixed Cardioid pickup pattern, has a maximum sound pressure level of 132dBspl, and boasts a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz. The Sony C-100 also has a Cardioid pattern, but offers a slightly lower maximum sound pressure level of 114dBspl and a somewhat narrower frequency response of 30 Hz to 18 kHz.

Experienced Opinion

Of course, technical specifications don’t always tell the full story. Experienced audio engineers generally prefer the Sony C-80 for its superior sound quality and ability to accurately capture every nuance in a sound source. The C-100 is also popular amongst sound engineers, but not quite as much as the C-80 due to its slightly narrower frequency range.

Which One to Choose?

For those looking to purchase either one of these mics, the decision often comes down to price. The C-80 is usually much more expensive than the C-100, however the quality of sound it offers is definitely worth the extra money. If budget is a key factor, then the C-100 would be an acceptable alternative.


In conclusion, Sony’s C-80 and C-100 condenser mics are two popular options amongst the audio engineering community. While the C-80 offers superior sound quality, the C-100 is often seen as an acceptable alternative due to its lower price. Ultimately, the choice between these two mics is up to the individual and their individual needs.

Read more.