:: About Us :::: DV/Film :::: Photo :::: Forums ::
:: Search Our Site ::
 



 
Home / DV-Film /


Movie Reviews Part Three
By Ron Steinman

Charlie Wilson’s War. Directed by Mike Nichols. When Tom Hanks, Charlie Wilson in the film, was doing publicity he wondered if people would be willing to see a movie about an often-wayward congressman – drink, drugs and women -- from a small district in Texas who suddenly discovered a cause and devoted his political life to seeing it through. This was either an honest approach to publicity or a ploy to get people into theaters. Now it doesn’t matter because the film mostly works as a good, old-fashioned Hollywood drama, often funny, sometimes moving, and with a message not too deeply buried in the context of the film about how Washington works and how one man despite all his faults could help change history. Ably acted by a strong cast from a fast moving script by Aaron Sorkin, put together neatly by the consummate pro, Mike Nichols, it is good entertainment. Charlie Wilson’s cause, ably abetted
and driven by a wealthy Texas woman, and a renegade CIA operative, was the help he gave the various tribes in Afghanistan in their fight against the Russian invasion. Wilson supplied the Afghans with modern weapons and technology, what they needed to defend themselves. Charlie Wilson’s efforts were successful through subterfuge and because he knew how Washington worked. He was able to increase his committee’s budget for helping Afghanistan with one billion dollars of the taxpayer’s money, without the taxpayer knowing what was going on. Afghanistan turned back the Russians, and the Russians tiring of the war and their high number casualties, exited that barren, inhospitable land returning to a Russia with its own problems. When the cause ended, those in Congress Charlie Wilson had enticed into helping him, turned against him. They did it either out of boredom, or what is so typical of Washington, an inability to focus too long on anything that doesn’t necessarily have a bearing on what is happening in one’s own district. Though a bit clunky at the end, the irony of the film is that the weapons supplied to the Afghan tribes through Charlie Wilson’s efforts eventually fell into the hands of the Taliban who used them to take over the country, and are probably still using some of them, to fight the NATO coalition forces now in Afghanistan in the battle against them and Bin Laden. The world indeed runs in mysterious ways.
....................................................................................................................................................................
Enchanted. Directed by Kevin Lima. Written by Bill Kelly. Unlike “Persepolis” with its heady theme of survival in the face of heavy odds, “Enchanted” has a simpler, more direct, much clearer premise. It is that love is good, and will win out in the end. Romance is all that matters. There is a prince and princess for everyone. Tears of joy mixed with the laugher of happiness are good for the soul. The film starts and with typical Disney animation and morphs into live action with a delightful Amy Adams as a princess banished from her magical kingdom because she loves a prince who is a threat to his mother, the evil queen. Magic in this film is healthy and in some ways is the only reality. Animals talk. There is that evil queen and her hapless, inept triggerman. He, too, as did the princess, turns from animated to human and fails miserably when he tries to do the wicked queen’s dirty deeds. The movie shamelessly uses Cinderella, Snow White and Sleeping Beauty to drive its story to its eventual happy ending. There are several wonderful musical numbers. The best takes place in Central Park. The special effects at the end are enough to enthrall most teenagers and even some adults. This is not a film I would ordinarily plunk money down to view. Despite my reservations to satisfy my best friend, I agreed to go with her see the movie. When I first learned about “Enchanted,” it seemed too much of a kid’s film or something for hopeless romantics. Despite those qualms, I walked out of the multiplex feeling good. The movie worked, not as great art but as good and diverting entertainment on a cold afternoon in Manhattan.

 ........................................................................................................................
At NBC News for 35 years, Ron Steinman was bureau chief in Saigon, Hong Kong and London, was a senior producer on Today and wrote and produced for Sunday Today. At ABC News Productions, he produced and wrote documentaries for A&E, TLC, Discovery, Lifetime and the History Channel. He has a Peabody, a National Headliner award, a National Press Club award, a International Documentary Festival Gold Camera Award, two American Women in Radio & Television awards and has been nominated for five Emmy's. He is a partner in Douglas/Steinman Productions, whose latest documentary, "Luboml: My Heart Remembers," aired on PBS' WLIW/21 and the History Channel in Israel, April 29, 2003. He is the author of, "The Soldiers 'Story", "Women in Vietnam," and most recently, "Inside Television's First War: A Saigon  Journal," University of Missouri Press, 2002.

 

About Us| DV/Film | Photo | Forums | | Home